One of the Most Incredibly Neglected Options for Ap Lang Exam Essay Samples

One of the Most Incredibly Neglected Options for Ap Lang Exam Essay Samples The Do's and Don'ts of Ap Lang Exam Essay Samples You ought to start early before the exam to create a very good improvement. For those who have access to multiple practice tests, you may even take complete tests at distinct times in the studying procedure to observe how you've improved and what you still must work on. Include this practice in your day-to-day study hour. So on test day be certain to keep calm and stick to these strategies. After you learn your very first new topic or cover a crucial idea, review it that night. If you don't keep tabs on your time, then you may find yourself with a paper without an introduction. How to best use practice resources as you study depends a whole lot on what sort of practice material you're using. Any sum of additional stress can severely influence your knowledge of vital concepts covered on the conclusion of the year exams. Ap Lang Exam Essay Samples: the Ultimate Convenience! It's often beneficial to select an argument that has more evidence and references to support that, even in the event that you do not necessarily agree with each small detail. Then, when you have answered all the questions that you feel more confident about, return to the harder questions, if time permits. It does not merely repeat the exact same points. In the event the answer is yes, attempt to structure your argument in order for your points build off one another. There is only one difference within this prompt, and it lies within this synthesis essay you should write. There is a particular essay in the prompt that you must analyze. Prompt consists of an article that you've got to synthesize. How to Get Started with Ap Lang Exam Essay Samples? Attempt to select the best devices to back up your argument that you are able to. As you learn your worth, you will be able to set up standards and make healthful boundaries. The prompt may request that you talk about the rhetoric devices utilized in a passage. Become knowledgeable about the kinds of topics and comfortable with writing in various modes. In addition, if you race through very good writing, you're likely to miss the subtlety and complexity. If you have to use a typical cliche phrase, attempt to change this up a bit by using synonyms for the verbs. At first the novel appears to be written for quite a specific audience. Studying each night could be a small struggle. Your exam is broken into portions. Befo re entering any AP class, it's most effective to read over the class overview and become familiarized with the exam. Some students think about the totally free response section being the hardest portion of the whole English exam. While your best students may not need them, less able students may find them useful strategies to start. Rubrics especially intended for introductory paragraphs also can be beneficial. Whenever you do take practice tests, it can be useful to find another person to assist grade your free-response essays dependent on the rubric. If at all possible, begin at the start of the semester. Instead, the very best plan is to pick out three supporting details you may concentrate on and develop. There are an amazing number of gray areas within the content that you should learn how to approach from every angle. The multiple choice section is 52-54 questions which make up 45% of your total score. Apart from the devices, the remainder of the multiple choice section is merely answering questions regarding the passage. Through such resources, you will discover the precise meanings of words along with knowledge about the content of what you're reading. The AP English argument FRQ is easily the most straightforward of the AP English FRQs as it is the most like essays you're already utilized to w riting. To approach such a writing, there are many steps which you could take to prepare. To score no less than a 3, students would be a good idea to use pertinent references from the text. Read the questions (if it is possible to answer a few without reading, go ahead), visit the passage, skim it for the pertinent sections and continue on... The essay option, I believe, could be a little more challenging to get ready for... aside from all of the practice essays you might have taken. How to compose a conclusion is what you need to know to produce your paper worth reading. Knowing the question you're answering is the most essential portion of AP writing. You are able to work on the prompt types that you locate the most difficult or practice outlining essays in a particular period of time, or writing all 3 essays in 120 minutes.

MCMULLEN SHEPHERD Entrepreneurial Act - 13331 Words

à ® ½ Academy of Management Review 2006, Vol. 31, No. 1, 132–152. ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTION AND THE ROLE OF UNCERTAINTY IN THE THEORY OF THE ENTREPRENEUR JEFFERY S. MCMULLEN Baylor University DEAN A. SHEPHERD Indiana University By considering the amount of uncertainty perceived and the willingness to bear uncertainty concomitantly, we provide a more complete conceptual model of entrepreneurial action that allows for examination of entrepreneurial action at the individual level of analysis while remaining consistent with a rich legacy of system-level theories of the entrepreneur. Our model not only exposes limitations of existing theories of entrepreneurial action but also contributes to a deeper understanding of important conceptual issues, such†¦show more content†¦However, the role this uncertainty plays in preventing entrepreneurial action has remained a matter of debate. As a result, two research streams have emerged, each inspired by alternative conceptualizations of uncertainty. The first stream focuses on the amount of uncertainty perceived and frequently discriminates those who decide to act entrepreneurially from those who do not as a matter of differences in knowledge (e.g., Busenitz, 1996; Gaglio Katz, 2001; Kaish Gilad, 1991; Kirzner, 1979). Thus, the amount of uncertainty is considered to be the barrier between prospective entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial action. The second stream highlights the willingness to bear uncertainty and typically proposes that those who decide to act entrepreneurially are distinguishable from those who do not owing to differences in motivation, attitude, or risk propensity (e.g., Douglas Shepherd, 2000; Knight, 1921; Schumpeter, 1934). In this scenario, an unwillingness to bear uncertainty is deemed responsible for preventing prospective entrepreneurs from engaging in entrepreneurial action. Because an individual must ultimately act to become an entrepreneur, and because action involves knowledge and motivation (Higgins Kruglanski, 2000), we propose that each stream merely emphasizes a different aspect of the uncertainty experienced in the decision to act entrepreneurially.Show MoreRelatedIndividual Level And Systemic Level Of Opportunity Recognition1511 Words   |  7 Pagesentering into new markets. Hence, it is vital for entrepreneurs to engage in opportunities that they have identified. The first form of the theory is system level approach, which is essentially involved in how the economic system operates (McMullen Shepherd, 2006). For this theory, economic conditions such as the stability of macroeconomic conditions and level of economic growth, income inequality, and employment might have an impact on the type of opportunities that will be available. For exampleRead MoreMarket-Oriented Approaches to Firms2515 Words   |  10 Pagesknowledge spans how knowledge is generated, communicated, analyzed and integrated to strengthen competitive standing (Caleiro, 2008). In more recent years, flattening organizations, incorporating specialized teams, and appointing middle managers who act as liaisons within the organizational hierarch y has helped many companies increase and expedite knowledge sharing (Dew et.al, 2004). This has also shifted power to employees who have a greater voice and role in the overall outcomes of the organizations

Stamp Act free essay sample

Taxation without Representation Ryan Vote March 8, 2010 U. S. History It can easily be said that the Stamp Act of 1765 was the beginning of the revolution for the colonies of North America, Before the Stamp Act, there were other failed attempts to tax the colonies by the British parliament. Each attempt to gain money from the colonies was unlawful because there was a lack of representation from Parliament. The Stamp Act of 1765 was very detailed and expensive for the colonists. The Stamp Act was the final act of taxation by Parliament before the colonies started to fight back and seek independence from Britain.Britain was struggling with a growing debt from previous wars. For example, the French and Indian War that lasted from 1756 until 1 763 was very expensive for Britain. It nearly doubled their debt. The debt was so expensive that Merely to pay the interest would require a heavier burden of taxation that had been known before (Morgan, 21). Moreover, it continued to be expensive after this war was over due to the fact that Butt Ministry decided in early 1763 to keep ten thousand British regular soldiers in the American colonies.It was said that the soldiers were kept in the colonies because many would be out-of- ark otherwise. Also, the American colonies were a liability: until the Englishmen outnumbered the hostile French and Indian population, there would be constant danger of repossession by France in a future war (Morgan, 22). Therefore, British Parliament felt that it was necessary to keep soldiers within the colonies. Because of this, Parliament looked directly at the colonies for money to help their own debt. In all fairness the Americans should help support the army protecting them (Morgan, 22).George Greenville of British Parliament, who became the Prime Minister in April of 763, undertook the Job of finding ways to alleviate his countrys debt. He thought Americans were grossly under taxed by comparison with Englishmen (Morgan, 23). Giving the British people more taxes was out of the question for Greenville because the Cider Tax was proof that there would be continued protesting if they received another. Greenville found that there were already laws on the books that should have been making money for Parliament from the Americans.However, the returns from these duties demonstrated equally the success of the American smugglers and the failure of the royal custom collectors (Morgan, 23). Greenville demanded that the deputies stop taking bribes instead of customs, that colonial governors start checking in on the deputies and that the Navy to start patrolling the American ports. To obtain a satisfactory revenue from them, he would have to get Parliament to revise them (Morgan, 24). George Greenville did much research before going ahead and taxing the colonists with the Sugar Act of 1764.The Sugar Act of 1764, it was usually called, because the part of It which drew most attention was the three-penny tax on stamp duties. Greenville evidently doubted that the revenue from the new [Sugar Act] duties would be as much as he wanted from the colonies. .. He simply announced his intention of levying a stamp duty?that is, an excise tax on various documents and articles made of paper?sometime in the future (Morgan, 26). Greenville received much advice from other Parliament members about how much the Sugar Act tax should be set at.He knew that duties on foreign molasses, whether large or small, were an advantage to the British sugar planters. But in order to benefit the Treasury, the duties must be set at a figure which, though high enough to yield a good income, loud not be so high as to stop the flourishing trade and hence the revenue (Morgan, 26). After much debate, in May of 1764 the colonists received news of the sugar tax that was to be imposed upon them. It was settled on a tax of 3 pence a gallon of molasses instead of 6 pence. That was not being enforced before; Parliament accepted it without a stir.Also, with the Sugar Act came restrictions of lumber exports. Colonial lumber (a big export of the colonies because there was so much) was now only allowed to export to Great Britain. Though from there it could be shipped, the increased costs might well destroy the trade (Morgan, 29). Moreover, there were also new wine duties and an abolition of drawbacks on foreign textiles. The colonists were shocked and upset at the high taxes being imposed upon them. It seemed that all the colonists money-making exports were being taxed. The old solution of smuggling was no longer practical, for the risk of seizure was so great that the added cost of smuggling would have the same effect as the payment of duties (Morgan, 29). The British Navy residing in America made sure that every tax was collected, even for the smallest load. The colonists found that the Ana was extremely strict and UN-bending to even loads being sent over rivers. Every ship was found by the Navy in need of a seize and detain method. The American merchants started to fight back. They boycotted pilots who brought naval vessels into port, offered mates and midshipmen higher wages than the Navy was allowed to pay, and raised howling mobs (Morgan, 30). Afterwards, Parliament prohibited paper money as legal tender and the colonists feared that they would have to go back to bartering. A small outcry of unconstitutionality started in Boston in mid 1764. James Otis published a pamphlet of colonial rights arguing that nature and the English Common Law entitled the colonists to the same rights as Englishmen (Morgan, 35).The colonists were not even able to elect government officials for the British Parliament and taxing them was seen as unconstitutional by the colonists. They kept asking to Just levy their own taxes within each colony. It was an abuse of the Parliamentary power to regulate trade.. . [it] infringed colonial rights By imposing duties on branches of colonial commerce which did not conflict with British interests (Morgan, 38). It kept raising the question of was this Sugar Act a regulation of trade or was it a mere revenue measure? Of course the latter was more unconstitutional than the other.This created a huge debate and outcry between Parliament and the colonists. However, by the time the Sugar Act was condemned, the Stamp Act was put into place in March 1765. Finally the Stamp Act was in place; George Greenville had been planning this for well over two years, having drafts written up in 1763. The printed text of the act occupied some twenty-five pages and documents that were now to have an added tax were: court proceeding papers, allege diplomas, bonds, grants, bills of sale, contracts, leases, appointments to public office, liquor licenses, playing cards, dice and newspapers. All these would now have to be written or printed on paper carrying a stamp embossed by the Treasury Office (Morgan, 73). The taxes on each document was anywhere from 3 pence to 10 pence and pamphlets were taxed a penny a sheet. The amounts had to be paid in sterling, not colonial currency (Morgan, 72). This tax was used to build supplies for the troops stationed in America. Not long after the Stamp Act was introduced to the colonists, riots ensued. Daniel Dually was a famous pamphleteer that really started the uproar.He was widely read and approved because of his intelligence. He wrote many pamphlets on the Parliaments right to tax the colonists issue. Dually had been particularly struck by the absurdity of the argument for Virtual representation (Morgan, 80). He read that the Ministry had argued for the Stamp Act in Parliament on the ground that the colonies were all virtually represented in Parliament, in the same manner as those of the subjects in Great Britain, who did not vote for representatives (Morgan, 80).He set out to prove that he colonies were not represented by Parliament and Greensville whole argument would be destroyed. He proved no English property-holder was in the same situation as an American (Morgan, 85). He argued for the natural rights of man and that the House of Commons could not make a bill of taxation. Moreover, he argued and wrote that no British subject could be taxed except by the consent of his representatives. Though the American colonists were British subjects, they were not represented in Parliament but only in their colonial assemblies.Therefore the colonial assemblies could tax them, but Parliament could not (Morgan, 88). In addition, many influential people within the colonies made public announcements against taxation without representation. For example, Benjamin Franklin was also concerned about the tax and was noted to say that, l never heard any objection to the right of laying duties to regulate commerce; but a right to lay internal taxes was never supposed to be in Parliament, as we are not represented there (Franklin Interview). Also James Otis, a young lawyer from Massachusetts wrote that The very act of taxing exercised over those who are not represented appears to me to be depriving them of one of their cost essential rights as freemen, and if continued seems to be in effect an entire disfranchisement of every civil right (Otis). Their words were admired by many colonists and Delays pamphlets were bought up by the hundreds. Their words were the main reason Americans found courage to revolt and began to send petitions to Parliament.With the help from the Sons of Liberty, the Stamp Act demonstrations became violent and forced stamp collectors into resigning. Some American merchants even boycotted importing any goods. The colonists were taking a stand against Britain and its unlawful tax. Finally, the Stamp Act of 1765 was repealed in March of 1766. It seems that Parliament had had enough. They may have even agreed with the colonists about their lack of real representation. However, by this time there was a new Prime Minister; Lord Rocking became the new leader in 1765.George Greenville no longer had the authority to keep the Stamp Act in affect and this may have been part of the reason it was repealed. Most importantly, all of the Stamp Act. Problems between the colonists and an unseen government seemed inevitable. Thomas Paine, author of a pamphlet called Common Sense, said it best about British Parliament, As a long and violent abuse of power, is generally the Means of calling the right of it in question (Paine).

Walden By Henry Thoreau Analysis Essays - Civil Disobedience

Walden By Henry Thoreau Analysis In Henry David Thoreau's infamous novel ?Walden?, we are shown endless paradoxes that stem from the author's deep and insightful views into nature's universal connections with the human race. Thoreau makes himself a quest of finding the meaning to our existence by investigating nature from different perspectives that our preoccupied society constantly overlooks. Two of these perspectives are of viewing nature from a mountaintop or panoramic view and the other being from our own earthly foundations. ?At other times watching from an observatory of some cliff or tree, to telegraph any new arrival; or waiting at evening on the hill-tops for the sky to fall, that I might catch something, though never caught much, and that, mannawise, would dissolve again in the sun? (Thoreau 336). In this passage, Thoreau tells us that he is searching for something but he is not sure of what it is exactly. He states that he has taken refuge plenty of times at sites that are at high altitudes to try to see more clearly so that the answers of life can become more apparent. He says he waits for the sky to fall, which of course it can't, but this tells me that he is looking for the unexpected or what hasn't been seen yet. The word ?mannawise? is a Thoreau ?original? word. I know, by my own knowledge, that ?manna? is another word or prefix for ?earth?, so when he says that the ?mannawise, would dissolve again in the sun?, I believe he is saying that his search has hit another rut without answers and so the sun sets and so does the earth's responses of wisdom. ?Let us settle ourselves, and work and wedge our feet downward through the mud and slush of opinion, and prejudice, and tradition, and delusion, and appearance, that alluvion which covers the globe, through Paris and London, through New York and Boston and Concord, through church and state, through poetry and philosophy and religion, till we come to a hard bottom and rocks in place, which we can call reality, and say, This is, and no mistake; and then begin (Thoreau 400). This is one of Thoreau's strongest statements using the perspective of burrowing down to our own roots to find the buried treasures of life. He tells us to forget everything we have learned and start all over with a fresh and clean state of mind. Once we do this we can experience true ?reality? and not what society has handed us to believe in. To work our way down through all we have been taught by man and to find the real answers in ourselves and nature and if we do this, only then shall we live and be. ?To my imagination it retained throughout the day more or less of this auroral character, reminding me of a certain house on a mountain which I had visited the year before. This was an airy and unplastered cabin, fit to entertain a travelling god, and where a goddess might trail her garments. The winds which passed over my dwelling were such as sweep over the ridges of mountains, bearing the broken strains, or celestial parts only, of terrestrial music? ?Olympus is but the outside of the earth every where? (Thoreau 390) In this passage, Thoreau gives us another panoramic view of being on a mountaintop where a house is, with a sight so beautiful and magical, that its only comparison would be of Olympus, home of the Greek gods. He gives us a past description of what he remembers about a rundown cabin and even though it was a decaying site, its towering position made it god worthy. Thoreau starts by stating that his present house looked like an ?auroral character?, setting an analogy of the sun shining all around his residence reminding him of the ?Olympus? site. This godlike place on the mountain has nature's own music playing by the ways of the wind passing through the holes and hollows of earth's landscapes. He uses the metaphor of Greek Mythology to give us a grandeur view of the earth so that we may see clearly and truly to find our real selves and world. ?Though the view from my door was still more contracted, I did not feel crowded or confined in the least. There was pasture enough for my imagination? (Thoreau 392). This is another statement which Thoreau uses the perspective of the ground and foundation to explain his point of view. I have this mental